Blog Archives

both sides to an argument are wrong because they are arguing

5/30/2025

both sides to an argument are wrong because they are arguing

The title of this post comes from the latest collection of Laeth’s aphorisms over at his Trees and Triads blog.

Laeth’s observation resonates with me, particularly as it pertains to religion and metaphysics.

I have no qualms about people openly sharing their religious beliefs and metaphysical assumptions. I dedicate a fair amount of space on this blog to precisely that because I find it vital to challenge, explore, and define my core assumptions. In a sense, I suppose you could say I am advancing arguments about my metaphysical assumptions.

Advancing such arguments invites counterarguments. Such counterarguments can be beneficial, provided that they stem from the right sort of motivations, but they rarely do.

On the contrary, arguments of all sorts tend to be rooted in the assumption that argument—with its basis in logic and reason—is a virtuous and unadulterated mode of knowledge transfer and acquisition. Yet the communication of reason and logic is nearly always laced and tainted with virulent strands of rhetoric and language trickery deployed to derail, disorient, and discombobulate.

The argument-counterargument approach is oppositional. Exchanges of this sort rarely, if ever, rise above the oppositional aspects embedded within the framework. What they tend to do instead is trap and entrench both sides into a pointless war of attrition.

None of the above qualifies as new or revelatory.

At the same time, Laeth’s point about both sides being wrong because they are arguing warrants reflection and acknowledgement, especially concerning matters of metaphysical assumptions/religion in this time and place.

Historical/traditional Christianity, as a religion, is founded on a bedrock of argument, yet this bedrock no longer appears to serve.

Two sides pitted against each other with the expressed aim of arguing a way to Jesus is indeed wrong in this time and place. Our task should involve forgoing argument altogether when it comes to metaphysical assumptions.

4 Comments

Roof Work Progressing

5/26/2025

5 Comments

I purchased and live in something called a Kádár Cube, the most prevelant type of house in Hungary, particularly in the countryside. My feelings about this communist architectural form are mixed. On the one hand, I find it garishingly simplistic, dare I say, almost brutalist in nature. On the other hand, the basic design does convey a certain charm. Kádár Cubes bear a striking resemblance to children's drawings of houses.

Anyway, I decided to get the roof redone this year. The old roof was still functional, but it was inching ever closer to its expiration date, and I thought it prudent to have it replaced before the inevitable leaks appeared in a few years' time. Here's what the house looked like with the old roof.

Street view. The old roof tiles are terracotta. The new ones will be the same but different in color.

View from the side of the yard. The photo doesn't do justice to just how "beat up" the old tiles are.

And here's the progress we have made thus far. If all goes well, the new terracotta tiles should be up next week.

Street view. The old tiles removed. New framing on the roof.

View from the back. Note the condition of the old beams. After the roof is done, I will focus on the walls that have yet to be polished up.

5 Comments

No Garden This Year

5/24/2025

7 Comments

I have planted and maintained a vegetable garden every spring since settling down in northwestern Hungary, but I have decided to forgo the endeavor this year.

I enjoy growing vegetables; however, I fear that all the other tasks I have set for myself this summer might render gardening a drudging chore, which is the last thing a backyard vegetable patch should be.

In light of this, I am going to let the soil lie fallow for a season and look ahead to next year's garden, which I will aim to make the most beautiful and productive I have ever cultivated.

7 Comments

Truth Has Two Meanings

5/17/2025

2 Comments

Truth has two meanings: there is truth as knowledge of reality and truth as reality itself.
-Nikolai Berdyaev, The Beginning and the End

I return to this observation by Berdyaev over and over again, and it often reminds me of the interaction between Pilate and Jesus as recorded in the Fourth Gospel, specifically the part where Jesus declares that everyone on the side of truth listens to him, which then prompts Pilate to respond by asking, “What is truth?”

Pilate’s response is an expression of truth as knowledge of reality. On the other hand, Jesus’s proclamation that he was born and came into the world to testify to the truth falls in line with Berdyaev’s notion of truth as reality itself.
Knowledge of reality is the realm of epistemology—theories of knowledge concerning how, what, and why we know what we know.

Truth as reality itself transcends most defined epistemic contacts with reality. It is not merely knowledge of truth as reality but the direct knowledge of truth as reality itself.

Knowledge of reality as truth relies on secondary thinking and knowledge. Truth as reality exists entirely in primary thinking and direct knowing.

Before encountering Jesus, Pilate existed exclusively in truth as knowledge of reality, as evidenced by his “What is truth?” quip.

Yet during his encounter with Jesus, Pilate most surely experienced truth as reality itself—a penetrating albeit fleeting moment of direct knowledge that provided a silent, wordless, yet infinitely deafening response to his quid est veritas.

Dostoevsky noted the following in a letter to Mme. N. D. Fonvisin, written in 1854:

I want to say to you, about myself, that I am a child of this age, a child of unfaith and skepticism, and probably (indeed I know it) shall remain so to the end of my life.

How dreadfully has it tormented me (and torments me even now) this longing for faith, which is all the stronger for the proofs I have against it. And yet God gives me sometimes moments of perfect peace; in such moments I love and believe that I am loved; in such moments I have formulated my creed, wherein all is clear and holy to me.

This creed is extremely simple; here it is: I believe that there is nothing lovelier, deeper, more sympathetic, more rational, more manly, and more perfect than the savior; I say to myself with jealous love that not only is there no one else like him, but that there could be no one. I would even say more:

If anyone could prove to me that Christ is outside the truth, and if the truth really did exclude Christ, I should prefer to stay with Christ and not with truth.

Truth as knowledge of reality resides in skepticism and unfaith, in the constant need to question the reality of the divine, and in the yearning to have the divine proved or disproved via some secondary medium or other.

Yet as Dostoevsky notes, even if truth as knowledge of reality could exclude Jesus, it would do little to dent truth as reality itself.

Direct knowledge of truth as reality itself is not guaranteed in this world. We could live our whole mortal lives without experiencing it once. Yet, this does not matter. What matters is our faith in truth as reality itself.

We remain on the side of truth as long as we are open to listening to Jesus and the possibility of experiencing moments in which we love and believe that we are loved.

Moments during which all is clear and holy.

2 Comments

A New Roof

5/16/2025

2 Comments

I will have a new roof installed on the house next week, starting on Tuesday. I had aimed to have the roof redone about four or five years ago, but the events of 2020-2021 significantly delayed that goal. In light of this, I feel immensely pleased and relieved that the roof’s time has finally arrived.

In many ways, the roof renovation represents a literal and metaphorical capstone in my life—a crowning achievement—particularly within the context of the ten years since my family’s move to Hungary. We had no house a decade ago. We barely had anything a decade ago. My wife and I roamed like vagabonds—Toronto, Budapest, Florida, New York, Toronto (again), and England—resided in rented flats and kept our store of personal belongings at spartan, portable levels.

That all changed after we moved to northwestern Hungary in 2015. Our first year was like all the previous years—a rented flat, this time in the city of Sopron, but within a year, we purchased a respectable house in a small village about forty kilometers from the city. We had enough money saved to buy the house without needing to take out a mortgage, which I welcomed and also viewed as a sort of redemption for all the money we had spent paying rent over the years.

More significantly, we had finally found a place to settle and call home. We immediately set about turning the place into our home. Years of renovations followed. The old house began to take shape and slowly came back to life. The final project starts next week. Once finished, the new roof will mark the completion of our house adventure.

Yet all of that is, at best, secondary.

Yes, new wiring, plumbing, flooring, roof, and all the rest of it were all required, yet none of it would have meant much had we not succeeded in filling the home with our love for each other right from day one.

2 Comments

Cultivating Primary Thinking is the Positive Response to AI

5/9/2025

5 Comments

Secondary thinking—thinking via language, symbols, and images—is an unavoidable and, until recently, seemingly irreplaceable form of thinking in mortal life. I say seemingly irreplaceable because current and projected AI applications have encroached and will likely continue to encroach upon this level of human thought.

As I noted in an earlier post on secondary thinking:

The use of symbols and language allowed man to participate in reality differently. Secondary thinking separated man from reality and granted the “space” needed for world discovery, self-discovery, and self-formation.

The alienation of modern man represents near-total submersion in the representational world, made all the more acute by the ever-increasing disconnect between reality and representations of reality.

This disconnection marks the virtual obliteration of primary thinking in favor of secondary thinking. Put another way, for modern man, secondary thinking via externally received symbolic information is reality because he is virtually incapable of connecting with reality in any other way.

Modern man now regards the symbols, language, and other representations used to shape, fashion, give form to, or describe as reality itself, both de facto (as in matter of fact) and de jure (as in legally and officially recognized).

Simply put, information used solely at the level of secondary thinking is now synonymous with reality. Whoever controls information at the secondary level of thinking also controls reality.

AI will further degrade the disconnect between human consciousness and its connection with reality, i.e., the spiritual. Conventional secondary thinking in the form of language, symbols, and images was at least a product of human thought.

The best and highest examples of such thinking could serve as bridges or connectors. Though such examples are not reality, they can inspire or motivate individuals to seek or experience that level of reality for themselves.

In other words, the best and highest “products” of secondary thinking could, when approached sincerely with the right motivations, lead other individuals to experience primary thinking for themselves. Not the same primary thinking that may have gone into the creation of the secondary-thinking “product,” but through the unique primary thinking experiences individuals “consuming” the product experienced for themselves.

AI utilizes the products of secondary thinking to manufacture its version of secondary thinking, which represents no thinking at all. Yes, it uses original sources, genuine products of human consciousness; however, its productions are fundamentally the product of no consciousness or, worse, the product of demonic consciousness.

Determining whether a product of secondary thinking is authentic (created by human consciousness) or AI-generated may be useful in our current situation. Yet, such determinations fail to address the deeper issue—the need to pursue primary thinking. Focusing exclusively on discerning the authenticity of whatever apparent secondary-thinking product we encounter is only meaningful if primary thinking is our overarching goal.

Primary thinking (direct knowledge) is the connection to reality that happens beyond the representational, in the realm of non-representational direct knowing originating from and connecting to the primal self.

AI-generated representational, secondary non-thinking may lead people away from authentic “products” of human-created secondary thinking, from the sorts of creations that can and sometimes do inspire, motivate, and guide individuals toward primary thinking; however, even the best examples of secondary thinking cannot substitute for primary thinking.

In a nutshell, being able to discern original, authentic, genuine secondary-thinking products from non-consciousness, photocopy-of-a-photocopy products generated by AI is only a fraction of the actual battle.

The actual challenge lies in cultivating primary thinking and direct knowledge -- knowledge for which not even the best exemplars of genuine, human-created secondary thinking can serve as a substitute.

5 Comments

The Apparently Unsolvable Mystery of Assumptions that Align with Rationality, Logic, and Common Sense Yet Engender “Face Palm” Discernment

5/7/2025

6 Comments

Many Christians insist that conventional/traditional metaphysical assumptions—and only conventional/traditional metaphysical assumptions—are founded upon the bedrock of rationality, logic, and common sense.

Such Christians assert that the assumptions they hold, assumptions consecrated and guarded by the majority of what constitutes mainstream/orthodox Christian institutions, are the only live wire to reality. These assertions are then supported by the further assertion that metaphysical assumptions that question or challenge tradition/orthodoxy are mired in grievous error.

On a personal note, I would likely be far more open to traditional/orthodox assumptions if they were not consistently undermined by a mortifying lack of discernment by those who continuously proclaim such assumptions as irrefutably based on reason, logic, and common sense.

Put another way, I sincerely wonder why those who profess steadfast alignment with reason, logic, and common sense routinely falter and fail in basic and rudimentary discernment, particularly when it comes to personal freedom, evil, love, honesty, and repentance.

Yes, yes, we are all fallen and limited. No one bats an average of a hundred when it comes to discernment. Yet there must be a point at which such excuses become threadbare and embarrassing. A point at which one must at least begin to question why one cannot live up to the reason, logic, and common sense of one’s professed assumptions.

The individual is certainly part of the problem; however, the problem also likely spills over into the assumptions one holds as rational and logical, as the veritable epitome of common sense.

6 Comments

Without Honesty and Repentance, There is Neither Learning Nor Freedom

5/6/2025

2 Comments

Honesty and repentance are among the most significant things Christianity asks of us.

The above comes from a video recently suggested to me through private correspondence. I will skip the actual subject matter of that video and focus instead on the thought expressed above, which has kept me ruminating for three or four days.

Honesty and repentance. I struggle to think of two things Christians and Christianity as a whole need more in this time of unmitigated lies and place of obstinate unrepentance.

Honesty for spiritual integrity and alignment with reality, and repentance for when our spiritual integrity crumbles and our alignment with reality falters.

One can only be truly free when one is honest. Honest with himself, honest with others, honest with the world, and honest before God.

Without that honesty, one can no longer claim to stand in truth. Freedom slips away, and one becomes a prisoner of untruth, however slight that untruth may be. Ultimately, when dishonest, we willingly become subjects of the Father of Lies.

The reasons for and causes of dishonesty are as plentiful as the stars in a clear night sky. Yet the vast majority trace back to fear, expedience, ego, and pride.

We are often too scared to be honest. Or we discover advantages in being untruthful. Or we refuse to admit that we may have been in error, wrongly motivated, or deceitful in intent. We are desperate to save face. To maintain our inflated (and false) sense of self. Or our pride simply rejects the truths our memory subtly communicates to us.

Whatever the case, it is virtually impossible for Christians to be honest all of the time. Even the most forthright among us slip, usually many times a day. Often far more than that. Every lie strips away our freedom and derails our alignment with the Divine.

Yet this virtual impossibility can be overcome through the power of repentance, which, as far as I’m concerned, qualifies as the ultimate expression of honesty, at least in mortal life.

Repentance is the sincere, straightforward, genuine acknowledgment of sin, particularly the sin of dishonesty. Repentance equals acknowledging and standing up to the very fear, expedience, ego, and pride that led us into sin in the first place. At its core, repentance is honesty about dishonesty.

Being honest about our dishonesty is one of our greatest challenges. Instead of being truthful, we often lie and then, to make matters worse, lie about our lying. The lies settle on each other and solidify in sedimentary layers, crushing the original chance at truth we originally rejected into dust.

Refusing to be honest about our dishonesty also hinders a core purpose of our mortal lives—learning, particularly spiritual learning. What can we expect to learn from our time in this world when we continually twist and warp our experiences through untruth?

How can we expect others to learn anything from us, save perhaps negatively?

Moreover, what sort of communion can we anticipate with the Divine if we offer nothing more than falsehoods, fabrications, deceptions, and dissimulation?

Worse, what can we expect from God when we refuse to admit our falsehoods and lie about our need to repent?

Learning requires honesty. Honesty is freedom. Slipping into dishonesty requires repentance so we may free ourselves to learn once more.

Without honesty and repentance, there is neither freedom nor learning, entailing that we may not have much to draw upon when presented with the choice of everlasting life after our mortal lives end.

2 Comments

Clown World Versus Clown World

5/5/2025

0 Comments

I don’t like the term “clown world.”

I use it here to draw attention to a predominant theme in the rightist/alt-right blogosphere—that some politics, geopolitics, economics, law, and all the rest of it fall under the category of clown world.

In contrast, some other forms of politics, geopolitics, economics, law, and the rest of it are not clown world or, even worse, are actually anti-clown world.

Psst. It’s all clown world. Politics, geopolitics, economics, law, and everything else within the officialdom of this time and place.

Clown world. All of it. The conflicts we perceive are merely clowns fighting clowns.

That’s it.

Clown versus clown, all the way down.

0 Comments

Smart-Stupid People Versus Stupid-Smart People

5/4/2025

0 Comments

Smart-stupid people believe that education -- particularly the trendy, expedient, this-worldly sort -- offers a surefire cure for stupidity.

They know they can mask their stupidity by saying the right words, mimicking praised patterns, echoing embraced platitudes, rearranging congealed forms, and imitating accepted arguments.

The correct combination of performance and content will make them appear intelligent in the eyes of other smart-stupid people. At the end of the day, that is all smart-stupid people really care about.

Naturally, they remain oblivious to the sinister smart people who make "smart-stupidity" viable by encouraging and promoting its widespread distribution and celebration. Smart-stupid people never question how or why they got to where they are, even though "where they are" is clearly and palpably far above and beyond where they should be.

They are thoroughly convinced that their intelligence is authentic (they have the accolades and baubles to prove it, after all); thus, they remain incapable of registering, let alone comprehending the "fake it till you make it" mantra.

To paraphrase a quote by Stephen Vizinczey, contrary to the reigning ideologies of the day, smart-stupid people are living proof of the inconvenient truth that education tends to fortify stupidity rather than cure it.

On the other hand, stupid-smart people are generally "naturally" intelligent individuals who possess the potential to think for themselves but choose to forgo that option, usually for expediency. Like their smart-stupid counterparts, the stupid-smart are not immune to the temptations of the System and all the enticing perks it offers.

Unlike the smart-stupid, the stupid-smart recognize System ideology as bullshit but rationalize their submission to it via "gotta make a living" or "can’t beat them, must join them." The stupid-smart largely comprises intelligent people who willingly and unrepentantly participate in gross dishonesty for the sake of pay, privilege, and prestige.

Below this is another, less visible level of stupid-smart people — the captives of ego and intellect. This category of stupid-smart is the most tragic because they honestly believe that the solutions to life, the universe, and everything reside entirely and exclusively within the intellect.

To put it bluntly, this category of stupid-smart people is so genuinely smart that they cannot get out of their own way.

They seek truth through logic, mathematics, laws, and formulas, convinced that the essence of Creation and spirit can be determined and comprehended solely through such means. They remain entirely ignorant of the fact that the best such truth-seeking logic can provide is knowledge of reality when what should instead be sought is truth as reality itself.

The above helps explain why stupid-smart people, despite their high cognitive abilities, rarely qualify as geniuses.

0 Comments

<<Previous